The ‘Fast-track’ part of the FITs review covers so-called ‘large scale solar’ (and farm-based AD)
This ‘review within a review’ seems to have been designed to curtail the UK’s embryonic solar electricity industry. There is a secondary look at ‘farm-based’ anaerobic digestion.
The government published its response to the consultation on 9th June 2011.
In effect it said it was ignoring the vast majority of responses to the consultation and pressing ahead with its original proposals (see here).
The House of Lords Merits Committee’s latest report has drawn the Government’s proposals to the special attention of the House – see here.
This creates the opportunity peers to call for a debate and even a vote on the issue. Our parent company was one of the signatories to the letter their lordships refer to at 6(i).
The government later introduced a further consultation on proposals to prevent system extensions claiming the FITs registration date of the original system. See further details here.
This sub-review was limited just to considering changes to the tariff levels for PV (i.e. changes to this table).
Government would like to get the legislative changes through before the summer recess in July 2011, with the new tariffs to take effect from 1st August.
Huhne takes action on Solar farm threat
While his ministerial statement says:
I have become increasingly concerned about the prospect of large scale solar PV projects under FITs, which was not fully anticipated in the original scheme.
In our efforts to protect the tariffs, we have pointed out some inconsistencies to the review generally. The fast-track element is especially questionable.
said Chris Huhne in the press release …
Rubbish! The regulatory impact assessment for the Feed-In Tariffs had a specific forecast for ‘large PV’
… and there is a specific tariff band for PV between 100kW and 5MW (all of which they now define as large scale …)
The Energy Act 2008 specifically defines all FIT-eligible systems – i.e. everything up to 5MW – as ‘small-scale’
Now they are seeking to define systems above 50kW (just 1% of the statutory definition) as ‘large-scale’.
What evidence were they using?
“Feed-In Tariffs will be refocused on the most cost-effective technologies”
said the 2010 Comprehensive Spending Review. Yet DECC now seems to want to stop installations paid 29.3p/kWh in favour of those paid 41.3p/kWh.
We said they should encourage both.
The press release sounded from the heading onwards to have decided what the outcome should be.
The final government announcement confirmed this, by sticking to the original proposals in the face of overwhelming opposition from respondents.